Oh, don’t worry, we agree!

]]>my strong belief is that one must be really ambitious and start from the condition that real physics and various p-adic physics (including algebraic extensions of p-adics and even finite-dimensional extensions such as those involving p powers of e) must be fused to single coherent whole.

This leads naturally to the generalization of the notions of the number and manifold and to the ideas that I summarized in previous posting.

By the way, I made a big step in the understanding of particle spectrum. As usual it was based on unpleasant question which always emerges after empty-head period.

My previous belief was that only Higgs boson corresponds to a (very tiny!) wormhole contact but the assumption that theory is free at parton level (TGD is almost topological QFT at parton level) forces the conclusion that also gauge bosons are wormhole contacts.

This simplifies enormously the predicted spectrum. It also allows to understand the distinction between graviton and other gauge bosons and allows now to understand the earlier speculative picture about stringy aspects of TGD at fundamental level.

The dramatic deviation from string models is that ordinary gravitons have length of order Compton wavelength of electron and stringy physics is responsible for the strong interactions of nuclei and central also for the understanding of high Tc superconductivity.

For a summary see my blog.

]]>Hey Kea:

Thanks I think I will post about this. I was looking over some notes from last year and some diagrammatic reasoning really shows up, and this occured before I studied Matti’s theory. But of course, his theory augments what little I know. Thanks:)