Ternary logic, as introduced on kneemo’s blog, is based on functions between three objects: 0, 1 and 2. Stepping back to the two object case, we see that there are four possible ways of mapping 0 and 1 into the two element set, which plays the role of subobject classifier in the topos Set. The values 00, 01, 10 and 11 form the four vertices of the parity square. It was the combinatorics of this simple square that led Gray to develop 2-categories and the Gray tensor product in the 1960s.

A unary arrow $0 \rightarrow 1$, thought of as a category, is used to lift morphisms in any 1-category to functors. Similarly, we would expect the square to form pseudofunctors for morphisms. This is what happens when the Mac Lane pentagon is lifted up to the sides of the parity cube.

Given that Gray based his whole theory of 2-categories on the parity square, it is natural to ask what would happen with the parity cube. After all, QCD prefers ternary logic. As kneemo noted however, things are immediately different for the cube. There is only one possible square on the two letters 0 and 1, but there are three possible cubes on the letters 0, 1 and 2. This brings a notion of triality into this higher categorical structure, which we expect will clarify the division algebras.

So it seems that all of 20th century physics comes from understanding nothing more than the low prime number 3. Then there are more primes…

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

## Mahndisa S. Rigmaiden said,

March 26, 2007 @ 3:12 pm

03 26 07

0,1,2 and 3 all seem to be so very special! But there are more primes than 3 and from number theoretic standpoint,all form a unique mesh and can label spacetime points. Matti’s theory assigns the largest known prime, a Mersenne number, to represent the largest spacetime distance (from specified defined orgin) of a star and I find that elegant.

Soon we will also use various primes to discuss DNA knots in more detail…

## Kea said,

March 26, 2007 @ 10:06 pm

Thanks, Mahndisa. Yes, the application to DNA will be very interesting. I also can’t wait to see what Materials Science does with p-adic physics.