Comments on: M Theory Lesson 19
https://arcadianfunctor.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/m-theory-lesson-19/
occasional wanderings in physics' brave new worldTue, 06 Mar 2007 22:47:00 +0000
hourly
1 http://wordpress.com/
By: Kea
https://arcadianfunctor.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/m-theory-lesson-19/#comment-490
Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:47:00 +0000http://arcadianfunctor.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/m-theory-lesson-19/#comment-490This observation enables one to build a string theory model living in normal dimensions which also accounts for mirror symmetry.

Why, thank you for your comment, anonymous! Yes, we are hoping to understand these things better from a more categorical viewpoint. Any further comments are appreciated.

]]>
By: Anonymous
https://arcadianfunctor.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/m-theory-lesson-19/#comment-489
Tue, 06 Mar 2007 16:38:00 +0000http://arcadianfunctor.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/m-theory-lesson-19/#comment-489I would like to add that the Euler-type integrals used in Kholodenko’s works belong to the hypergeometric-type integrals considered in detail by Aomoto and Gelfand (with collaborators). In the honeycomb paper arguments are presented in favour of universality of such type of integrals. That is to say, all physical problems-from quantum mechanics to quantim field and string theory- should involve such type of integrals. This observation enables one to build a string theory model living in normal dimensions which also accounts for mirror symmetry. No compactification and/or dimensional reduction problems exist for such a model.
]]>